Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 14:32:53 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Usability Of NOCLEAN Message-ID: <20040306223253.GE74091@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <404A1A69.9060207@bis.midco.net> References: <404A1A69.9060207@bis.midco.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+SfteS7bOf3dGlBC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:37:29PM -0600, Peter Schultz wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm just curious about the usability of NOCLEAN. If I've just updated=20 > world and things are fine with the installation, is it considered safe=20 > to use NOCLEAN? A couple updates to libc came in this morning just=20 > after I installed a fresh world and I'm wondering what others do in=20 > cases like this. You can often use it, except when you can't. It's mostly safe when you only have minor changes, but at the first sign of trouble you should re-run without NOCLEAN, and never report a build failure from a NOCLEAN world because it's likely to be your fault :-) Kris --+SfteS7bOf3dGlBC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFASlGVWry0BWjoQKURAlwKAJ4qhUJgTr3P7K3hlXwz63EPltV2YwCgu4/V o8gt9YF9vKsYFEis7f/p8lY= =46Ix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+SfteS7bOf3dGlBC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040306223253.GE74091>