Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:31:22 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc:        Alex de Joode <a.dejoode@leaseweb.com>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...
Message-ID:  <201210191731.22668.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <17ECE3EA4CEBE34A910A8B067A4DABA71B9B3C@nlhlmexdb03.ocom.lan>
References:  <17ECE3EA4CEBE34A910A8B067A4DABA71B771C@nlhlmexdb03.ocom.lan> <508155E4.3040602@FreeBSD.org> <17ECE3EA4CEBE34A910A8B067A4DABA71B9B3C@nlhlmexdb03.ocom.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, October 19, 2012 2:26:45 pm Alex de Joode wrote:
> https://sabotage.org/FBSD/FBSD-9.1RC2.jpg
> 
> Screen shot. Basicly the only diff between the two r210 are the disks, 
> one has 2x2TB (works) and the one that has 2x1Tb fails with the above error.
> 
> Both are sw/ mirrored. No hw/ raid and ACHI sata settings.

Hummm, somehow we are executing data, not code:

00000000  8c 39 00 00 01 82 44 45  4c 4c 20 20 50 45 5f 53  |.9....DELL  PE_S|

That isn't a valid instruction. :(

Also, your eip value is not anything that would be normal.

Actually, your eip value looks like a pointer into the BIOS (0xf000:bf6a).

I bet something in your BIOS had a buffer overrun and trashed the stack or
some such.  Or it overran an I/O buffer which trashed the return stack of
the userland process somehow.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201210191731.22668.jhb>