From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 26 17:16:36 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235525A7;
 Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:16:36 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A20013A2;
 Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r3so3819572wey.17
 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=SupAv+7+37CGo3WR+bcT4XVJn8rEHO1sCuFWOdgue1o=;
 b=glmQAgmpD9M7lO0xA3hIF3x6ibLbfKJKepPfCmEFCQw8GhLF6dQbr3D7uPOWYEvHNq
 lbILYSzkUmyIh8pubvozdmcUTAq4DcdqtzZu4RJwx+urtZi/ixL8MHqpijHivET+xb15
 g8VLG23bllc3HBXswvDVE6F9uIPQ8YHzlFY9jkNAhWBPV8DSFnBTCOnwhUfd7DnSNSh+
 MLK4LE2m04kaFkkLV8kolQusZptyCUdeAmCH2UyXotW+qZT3m3uwu1Nb4XinUbLDnlh8
 tHG1UBDSnuQ/3vmpxjrNEe1OKvxsHHyTEZRqJygztFvXhvJbfv22laO3Hh2SoTy+Ka09
 QSFw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.87.170 with SMTP id az10mr5523601wib.3.1366996594729;
 Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.217.58.138 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+q+Tcru+YRc5JAumHBtWUu8C-WOFiAC3AckMmYthmZK9mT=MQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5176E5C1.9090601@soe.ucsc.edu>
 <20130426134224.GV76816@FreeBSD.org>
 <CA+q+Tcru+YRc5JAumHBtWUu8C-WOFiAC3AckMmYthmZK9mT=MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:16:34 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VgPi071wJEKUvXvKL3wFiHOjfhw
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokXL4jidSwTvwp9dwvffNQww1YcVPEOHyAjYRAQN_f9LA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pf performance?
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
 Erich Weiler <weiler@soe.ucsc.edu>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:16:36 -0000

On 26 April 2013 09:22, Olivier Cochard-Labb=E9 <olivier@cochard.me> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrot=
e:
>>
>> In FreeBSD 10 pf is no longer under single lock. On your hardware,
>> I'd expect a measurable performance gain if you migrate to 10.
>
> Compairing 9.1 and current (249908) on my new test-server (HP ProLiant
> DL320 G5, dual-core Xeon 3050, dual Intel NIC).
> Like usual: one unidirectional flow of small packets, values in
> packet-per-seconds:
>
> x 9.1
> + current
>     N           Min           Max        Median           Avg        Stdd=
ev
> x   5        379991        381508        381229      380892.6     667.699=
26
> +   5        332833        335502        334726      334223.2     1142.82=
66
> Difference at 95.0% confidence
>         -46669.4 +/- 1364.98
>         -12.2526% +/- 0.358363%
>         (Student's t, pooled s =3D 935.915)

Do you have witness, etc enabled in -current?



adrian