From owner-freebsd-advocacy Mon Sep 18 21:25:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from homer.softweyr.com (bsdconspiracy.net [208.187.122.220]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDF837B422 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2000 21:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=softweyr.com ident=Fools trust ident!) by homer.softweyr.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13bF6p-0000Ig-00; Mon, 18 Sep 2000 22:34:19 -0600 Message-ID: <39C6ECCB.9ED273D@softweyr.com> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 22:34:19 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carlos A M dos Santos Cc: Mike Doyle , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Articles on the "Open Source" concept References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Carlos A M dos Santos wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Wes Peters wrote: > > > Carlos A M dos Santos wrote: > > > > > > You shoult take a look at "The Ethics of Free Software" for a less rosy > > > point of view: > > > > > > http://www.sdmagazine.com/features/2000/03/f4.shtml > > > > Heh, I've even referenced this article myself. I did, however, have > > the sense to point out Dr. Meyer contradicts himself several times in > > the course of this diatribe, even stooping so low as to perform > > *exactly* the same disservice he so thoroughly chides Eric Raymond > > for, in the process of chiding Eric. Upon contemplation, this is a > > poorly thought out impassioned plea masqeurading as a carefully > > written philosophical discourse. > > Of course it's a philosophical discourse, in the same sense that ESR's > "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" (CatB) is, but I could not find a single > lie in Meyer's article. CatB, OTOH is full of false assumptions about the > quality of "open source" software and is based on a distorted > interpretation of Fred Brook's book "The mythical man-month". CatB has no > scientific base. Did I in any way infer that it has an scientific base, or even any value? No. It is a poorly written and very poorly thought-out advertisement for Linux. Dr. Meyer's article is presented as a philosophical discourse, but in truth is a carefully worded ad hominem attack on Eric S. Raymond, which has NO place in public discourse about software development methodology. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message