From owner-cvs-all Mon Oct 29 1:19:36 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4814137B401; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 01:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15y8ao-0001Jk-00; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:20:26 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." , Will Andrews , Maxim Sobolev , John Baldwin , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/automake Makefile distinfo pkg-plist In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:43:55 PST." <20011028214355.C61230@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:20:26 +0200 Message-ID: <5067.1004347226@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:43:55 PST, "David O'Brien" wrote: > > When you're contributing patches back to the author, that makes sense. > > But we don't have to carry the patches around in the port. > Make the patch to configure.in, mail it off; commit the patch to > configure -- save some dependancies for the poor ports builder. That's how I see it as well. Sorry if the brevity of my message left you thinking I meant something else. Ciao Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message