From owner-freebsd-isp Tue May 30 14:29:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from laf.cioe.com (laf.cioe.com [204.120.165.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CD537BE3F for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 14:29:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@ns1.cioe.com) Received: from ny1wsh031 (blackhole.cioe.com [204.120.165.44]) by laf.cioe.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA63254; Tue, 30 May 2000 16:28:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from steve@ns1.cioe.com) Message-ID: <070f01bfca7e$040f39e0$851a050a@winstar.com> From: "Steven E. Ames" To: "Steve Reid" , "spork" Cc: References: <20000530135538.A1171@grok.localnet> Subject: Re: Cucipop port/source Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 16:28:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Isn't 'cucipop' commercial? I remember trying it once and seeing a $200 registration fee... or I could have been offending the sleep gods at that point and just hallucinated it? -Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Reid" To: "spork" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 3:55 PM Subject: Re: Cucipop port/source > On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 04:06:58PM -0400, spork wrote: > > With yet another QPopper bug, we're thinking of moving to cucipop. I have > > a few questions for anyone who may be using it: > > If security is your concern, consider popa3d by Solar Designer. Security > is stated as the primary design goal. /usr/ports/mail/popa3d and > http://www.openwall.com/popa3d/ > > Unfortunately it is feature-limited. > > > Now if we could just find an attractive IMAP server... :( > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message