From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 2 14:06:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0241816A4DE; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henrik@brixandersen.dk) Received: from ns2.pil.dk (ns2.pil.dk [195.41.47.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C047A43D5F; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:06:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from henrik@brixandersen.dk) Received: from osgiliath.brixandersen.dk (osgiliath.brixandersen.dk [87.53.223.189]) by ns2.pil.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB3E7BA5AD; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:06:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by osgiliath.brixandersen.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA34C2EC3; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:06:28 +0200 From: Henrik Brix Andersen To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20060802140628.GL17004@osgiliath.opasia.dk> Mail-Followup-To: Poul-Henning Kamp , "M. Warner Losh" , bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org References: <20060802.073232.-494097392.imp@bsdimp.com> <17702.1154526225@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17702.1154526225@critter.freebsd.dk> X-PGP-Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/HenrikBrixAndersen.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/101228: [nanobsd] [patch] Two more entries for FlashDevice.sub X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:06:35 -0000 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 01:43:45PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I'm afraid I have to agree with Warner here. >=20 > I was hoping that the vendors would standardize on a limited number > of geometries, but it seems that yet again my faith in the wisdom > of hardware vendors is not supported by evidence. So what should happen with the existing entries in FlashDevice.sub? Should we deprecate it alltogether - or leave it as a half-baked solution? Regards, Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG signed iD8DBQFE0LFkv+Q4flTiePgRAuQDAJ0XXoWQ6DcZHmdo1f+TaIRzxm9NMACdGP6d aYuLAkxYTLwA6T9+pHQRkT8= =pKgW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--