From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 14 20:17:29 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73411065675
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 May 2010 20:17:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626D18FC1B
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 May 2010 20:17:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua
	[10.1.1.148])
	by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o4EKHYIK012179
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 14 May 2010 23:17:34 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
	o4EKHKa4029160; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:17:20 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: (from kostik@localhost)
	by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o4EKHK2f029159; 
	Fri, 14 May 2010 23:17:20 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to
	kostikbel@gmail.com using -f
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 23:17:20 +0300
From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Message-ID: <20100514201720.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References: <20100514152408.GN56080@hoeg.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="utew04vv9FCWZJ01"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100514152408.GN56080@hoeg.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_40,
	DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
	skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua
Cc: FreeBSD Arch <arch@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Request for review: build infrastructure for Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 20:17:30 -0000


--utew04vv9FCWZJ01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 05:24:08PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello all,
>=20
> At BSDCan there has been a general agreement that in order to make Clang
> a viable replacement for GCC 4.2.1, it should be integrated into FreeBSD
> HEAD and installed by default as soon as possible.
Could you, please, educate us lurkers not so lucky to attend the
BSDCan, what is the reasoning that leads to such conclusion ?

--utew04vv9FCWZJ01
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvtr9AACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jbCgCghRQhyDoD7QqKOVaGUHpesyKq
sFsAn2G0AJ6+KiQ3Q+HLwcLX85OVs3r2
=9AqW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--utew04vv9FCWZJ01--