Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 15:11:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@polstra.com, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rtld-elf patches for non-i386 architectures (review / test request) Message-ID: <200206162211.g5GMBgri042006@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200206162042.g5GKg5JW041655@apollo.backplane.com> <20020616205719.GC67925@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:Why memset(3) the anon memory to zero, isn't that what it's supposed
:to be initialized to anyway?
:
:--
:-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
I was just being ultra-conservative. You are absolutely correct
in regards to the anonymous area already being zero. I would like
to commit with the memset()'s in just for uniformity and then make
another pass to remove them. (there's no real issue of cpu waste
since we are going to take faults on the anonymous pages anyway).
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206162211.g5GMBgri042006>