Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:27:46 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: fam vs gamin
Message-ID:  <43D49382.508@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060123040721.GA95972@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20060123040721.GA95972@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Are devel/fam and gamin supposed to be compatible?  They both provide
> a libfam, but since I switched from fam to gamin, my courier-imap is
> segfaulting.  This persists after I rebuild it.

Do you have a backtrace?  I have been using Gamin for a while, and have
never noticed any adverse affects.

> 
> Also, this port hard-codes a dependency on devel/fam.  Shouldn't such
> ports have been fixed before changing the default, since they'll
> otherwise record the wrong dependency when gamin is installed?

Yes, we need to fix these hardcoded examples.

Joe

> 
> Kris
> 


- --
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team	::	gnome@FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD1JOCb2iPiv4Uz4cRAqyFAKCaXXxPlRQ59b8BDAcDt6L9g9ZczwCcDPRo
AiXR9a75Tu4wat20+od1sF8=
=sGOH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43D49382.508>