From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 19 08:15:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC806FB; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177F51A17; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB18840030; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:15:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id D57604002F; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:15:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (unknown [94.254.45.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 587D140023; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:15:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3g9n6q05ymz8gh2; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:15:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id m8NkvDiVZd7t; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:15:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3g9n6m4W47z8ggv; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:15:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (tifa.daemonic.se [10.32.0.6]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3g9n6m2H7vz9CvV; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:15:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by tifa.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3428C22818; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:15:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <535230AE.60609@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:15:42 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: svn commit: r351411 - in head: . Mk accessibility/gok archivers/libarchive archivers/xar astro/boinc-astropulse astro/boinc-setiathome-v7 astro/celestia astro/foxtrotgps astro/gpscorrelate astro/ni... References: <201404161828.s3GISoA3071853@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:15:51 -0000 On 04/19/14 01:55, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2014, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> Date: Wed Apr 16 18:28:47 2014 >> New Revision: 351411 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/351411 > : >> All affected ports have had their portrevisions bumped as a consequence of >> this. > > It looks like something went a bid oddly with that PORTREVISION bump: > > % svn diff -c 351411 emulators/wine-devel/ > Index: emulators/wine-devel/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- emulators/wine-devel/Makefile (revision 351410) > +++ emulators/wine-devel/Makefile (revision 351411) > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > > PORTNAME= wine > DISTVERSION= 1.7.16 > +PORTREVISION=3 > PORTEPOCH= 1 > CATEGORIES= emulators > MASTER_SITES= SF/${PORTNAME}/Source \ > > This went from no PORTREVISION to 3? > > Gerald > The portversion of whine was probably bumped, and I missed to decrease portrevision after that. It doesn't really harm anything anyway. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising