Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jun 2002 04:59:00 -0700
From:      Lawrence Sica <lomifeh@earthlink.net>
To:        Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
Cc:        "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz>, Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Possible security liability: Filling disks with junk or  spam
Message-ID:  <3D170984.6010003@earthlink.net>
References:  <200206232339.g5NNdXJw079333@cwsys.cwsent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group wrote:
> In message <008901c21afc$4a836100$44ec910c@daleco>, "Kevin Kinsey, 
> DaleCo, S.P.
> " writes:
> 
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Lawrence Sica" <lomifeh@earthlink.net>
>>To: "Trevor Johnson" <trevor@jpj.net>
>>Cc: <security@FreeBSD.ORG>
>>Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 12:07 AM
>>Subject: Re: Possible security liability: Filling disks with junk or spam
>>
>>
>>
>>>Trevor Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>>>>A client recently called me in puzzlement, saying that his system was
>>>>>misbehaving, and it turned out that this was what had happened. The
>>>>
>>address
>>
>>>>>"news@victim.com" had somehow wound up on quite a few spammers' lists.
>>>>
>>He'd
>>
>>>>>never used or hosted netnews, and so had no need for the pseudo-user.
>>>>
>>But that
>>
>>>>>pseudo-user was there by default, and the system dutifully created a
>>>>
>>mailbox
>>
>>>>>for him/her/it when the very first spam arrived. It started growing by
>>>>
>>leaps
>>
>>>>>and bounds until it was -- I kid you not! -- several hundred megabytes
>>>>
>>in
>>
>>>>>size. At which point the partition ran out of room.
>>>>>
>>>>>It seems to me that pseudo-users should be non-mailable, just as a basic
>>>>>security policy. Ideas for the best way to implement this in the default
>>>>>install?
>>>>
>>>>  <snip RFC interp and suggested inetd.conf comments>
>>>
>>>Consider that the daily output includes a df output so you just need to
>>>read your root email ;)
>>>
>>>--Larry
>>>
>>
>>And that's a great point worthy of a reposting.  While it's unfortunate that
>>someone got their disk filled with junk, it's also seemingly indicative of a
>>general lack of supervision on that box.  The first line of defense is the
>>scrutiny of the operator, not necessarily the revision of the OS.
> 
> 
> Agreed and scrutiny by the operator should also be the last line of 
> defense.  Little do many understand that an experienced sysadmin is the 
> best asset they can have.  Unfortunately many companies and 
> organizations are unwilling to pay for that.
> 
> 
>>One of the reasons I choose FBSD over other servers, especially M$, is
>>that it's not too hard to do some reading and learn the OS; learn a couple
>>of easy command line statements and see what's installed, what services are
>>running, and etc  Patience is a virtue, time with a browser a must, but no
>>rocket science degree is needed.
>>
>>Perhaps this should be added to /stand/sysinstall:
>>        "You have just installed an operating system.  Before you reboot
>>your
>>computer, PLEASE take some time and learn just what the thing will be
>>doing while it sits in your home and/or place of business...."
> 
> 
> Or hire or rent someone with the qualifications and experience to do it 
> right.  Of course paying a lot of money doesn't guarantee that the job 
> will be done right.  I've seen cases where high priced vendor personnel 
> installed insecure systems stating that the <vendor> O/S comes secure 
> right out of the box and that no additional security "tweaking" was 
> required.  Unfortunately these systems were quickly discovered by 
> spammers.  The rest was history.
> 
> 
Mistrust of vendor defaults is, unfortunately, the first thing one often 
learns heh.  I guess though this is getting into off topic for this list 
  what is really needed is better training, and the resources for that. 
  I am not sure of the best solution here, I myswelf have written some 
articles and try and help where I can in that regard.

--Larry


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D170984.6010003>