From owner-freebsd-security Sun Sep 24 20:59:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A657B37B422 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 20:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA13617; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 21:57:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA06561; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 21:57:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 21:57:55 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200009250357.VAA06561@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mipam@ibb.net Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , "Vladimir Mencl, MK, susSED" , Ali Alaoui El Hassani <961BE653994@stud.alakhawayn.ma>, CrazZzy Slash , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: Encryption over IP In-Reply-To: <20000924223816.F590@ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl> References: <20000924205556.D590@ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl> <20000924223816.F590@ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Your throughput goes down the drain, but it works fine and it's easy > > to set up. And remember, sweeping generalizations are always wrong. > > > > Not really. > Tcp always assumes an unreliable carrier, which isnt the case in tcp > over tcp. This can cause problems in some situations. Actually, TCP in it's current incarnation assumes a 'reliable' connection where unreliability is caused by congestion, which it attempts to avoid. In general, the more reliable the carrier, the better TCP tends to work. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message