From owner-freebsd-hardware  Mon Aug 11 19:59:25 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA21063
          for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.com (pegasus.com [206.127.225.31])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA21046
          for <hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pegasus.com (8.6.8/PEGASUS-2.2)
	id QAA09693; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 16:58:58 -1001
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 16:58:58 -1001
From: richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk)
Message-Id: <199708120259.QAA09693@pegasus.com>
In-Reply-To: Randy Berndt <rberndt@nething.com>
       "Re: K6-200 Has anyone successfully done a 'make world' ?" (Aug 11,  8:56pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: "hardware@freebsd.org" <hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: K6-200 Has anyone successfully done a 'make world' ?
Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

} Pardon me for being REALLY dense, but .... Isn't the K6 supposed to be
} compatible with the Pentium >> CHIP << ??? Not a program that operates on
} that chip???
} 
} If Freebsd uses pentium instructions, how can it become incompatible?

So it has no enhancements, extra features, speed ups or anything that might
make it different in some way?

There's a difference between running programs and running an OS.


Richard