From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Dec 14  9:36:13 2000
From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 14 09:36:11 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D88BC37B400
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:36:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa58504@salmon>; 14 Dec 2000 17:36:06 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:36:05 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mikko@dynas.se>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Rejecting a connection: is accept(2) correct?
Message-ID: <20001214173605.A53698@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012140905220.336-100000@explorer.rsa.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012140905220.336-100000@explorer.rsa.com>; from mikko@dynas.se on Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 09:12:18AM -0800
Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 09:12:18AM -0800, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:

> Is this really true?  A quick experiment with recvmsg() seems to
> indicate it is not, at least not for TCP sockets.

I think this applies after you have accepted the connection.  You
can call getpeername() to choose what to do about the call. You
can immediately close the connection if you don't want to deal with
it.

	David.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message