From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 02:07:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FE216A4C0 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amsfep16-int.chello.nl (amsfep16-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE1844042 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:07:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com) Received: from c104187.upc-c.chello.nl ([212.187.104.187]) by amsfep16-int.chello.nlESMTP <20030930090711.VQYY6291.amsfep16-int.chello.nl@c104187.upc-c.chello.nl>; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:07:11 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan Organization: Wanadoo Nederland B.V. To: Jean-Baptiste Quenot , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:07:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <20030909152452.GC10815@watt.intra.caraldi.com> <20030929130756.59cfb046.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> <20030929172043.GA54396@watt.intra.caraldi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030929172043.GA54396@watt.intra.caraldi.com> X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309301107.39481.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> Subject: Re: New port: NumlockX X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:07:19 -0000 Jean-Baptiste, I won't be able tto handle your request today. I hope to have it done by tomorrow. Are you satisfied with the www/resin3 port? Could you please review your www/resin2 port (portlint and make install deinstall) and then send me a new tgz file? I'll commit it ASAP. Ernst Op maandag 29 september 2003 19:20, schreef Jean-Baptiste Quenot: > * Adam McLaurin: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:46:44 +0200 Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > > > I'm wondering why it always takes *ages* to change the ports tree. > > > Either the committers are not interested, or they don't have spare > > > time to handle such requests. > > > > According to the audit trail on ports/56638 , Ernst found many > > problems with the port when running it through portlint. > > Ernst picked this PR today, and I thank him for having done so. > > > Have you addressed these issues? Perhaps he needs to run it through > > again. > > I adressed these issues immediately, the updated port is available.