From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 27 14:24:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C9D16A4DA for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mag@intron.ac) Received: from smtp.263.net (smtp.x263.net [211.150.96.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A5643D4C for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:24:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mag@intron.ac) Received: from origin.intron.ac (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17488F1B55 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:24:57 +0800 (CST) X-KSVirus-check: 0 From: "Intron" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:22:22 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1154010289.16018@origin.intron.ac> Cc: des@des.no Subject: Warning Message from uma_zdestroy(9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:24:51 -0000 Why does uma_zdestroy(9) print message like: Freed UMA keg was not empty (100 items). Lost 2 pages of memory. But actually I have made sure that uma_zalloc(9) and uma_zfree(9) appear in pair in my code. Does it represent any problems? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From Beijing, China