From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 23 21:27:06 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885A199F;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:27:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com
 [209.85.223.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DE990;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:27:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 16so14553810iea.12
 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:27:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
 :subject:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=Ivy7C2YjvDfWp3QZS8yC0nQrhMbEcWyVaemhiS/3fa8=;
 b=zD5E0aIEDSnyWNt0WzLtOfa9WlNyfsbpL1BeP1fFSSuMTjB8U/Xx2KqiEuVtnzcfmo
 1TieAnjL4moMybwoRUZoPMLW7FMXC1cEEbfD01pnIvos9EiOisrk8xmjer0wZvJiQFjO
 CaV9YMQVmxQ6k5xe8VtmoNAYp2tKxJTJs4p+zIIDi3PMVHQLNVJRBNUvs9zHOrhlKxf0
 BqeIid6lCH7n0MFMEcimxhv+Wf4oU6/vVBaT31ozBkRC2JR3jOY1Xw6cD58Zk+gnaBF1
 LZ6foO2KcXV/xmcV+VDMdTuNVO8djuadNVQbfqX0LONHxku0Yfnee/S9oLDh9129MiyQ
 wS4Q==
X-Received: by 10.50.202.97 with SMTP id kh1mr16748010igc.15.1358976425937;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:27:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.16.73 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:26:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301232224070.1971@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <CACpH0Mf6sNb8JOsTzC+WSfQRB62+Zn7VtzEnihEKmEV2aO2p+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301211201570.9447@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <20130122073641.GH30633@server.rulingia.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301232121430.1659@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <CADLo838Rst7wEtV7DpY23XjpcFCsOkrN=axE1AscyO7vYgSKSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <op.wrdudwx334t2sn@markf.office.supranet.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301232224070.1971@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:26:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CADLo83_UGGcaeAxvo3uSr6SMomOx96SPv3JUNkTXOx4=AW_WAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS regimen: scrub, scrub, scrub and scrub again.
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>,
 "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
 Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:27:06 -0000

On 23 January 2013 21:24, Wojciech Puchar
<wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>>
>> I've heard this same thing -- every vdev == 1 drive in performance. I've
>> never seen any proof/papers on it though.
>
> read original ZFS papers.

No, you are making the assertion, provide a link.

Chris