From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 20:47:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C02016A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:47:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1817943D2D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:47:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIutv-0000yl-Sd for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:43:55 +0200 Received: from pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.83.169.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:43:55 +0200 Received: from apeiron+usenet by pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:43:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Christopher Nehren Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Organization: /usr/bin/false Lines: 32 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: p5-POE-Component-IRC maintainer AWOL; no MX record for domain, domain's port 25 is refused. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:47:15 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've prepared an update for p5-POE-Component-IRC bringing it into this year (the last update was about two years ago, in 8/2003). The last update that the maintainer made was also their only update -- bringing it up to 2.6. Every update since then (aside from a pkg-comment removal) has seen a maintainer timeout and has been contributed by Mathieu Arnold. What's the proper procedure in a situation like this? I can't contact the maintainer because their host 1. doesn't have any MX records at all (*sigh*) 2. doesn't even accept connections on port 25 (refusing them) I would be glad to step up as maintainer of the port, if no one has any objections. Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUvitk/lo7zvzJioRAhcZAJ9q8jYaPPMxtvdR4drABwyMMraxCQCeLxEZ 5c1pbtMZkSL6Bvc+jO6txa4= =J7+A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly.