From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri May 18 13: 2:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from smtp-2.enteract.com (smtp-2.enteract.com [207.229.143.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FE737B42C; Fri, 18 May 2001 13:02:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@tumbolia.com) Received: from shell-2.enteract.com (shell-2.enteract.com [207.229.143.41]) by smtp-2.enteract.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E96661C; Fri, 18 May 2001 15:02:16 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:02:16 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt X-X-Sender: To: Will Andrews Cc: "Fernando P . Schapachnik" , , Terry Lambert , , Subject: Re: Exchange substitute In-Reply-To: <20010518145650.E26877@casimir.physics.purdue.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 18 May 2001, Will Andrews wrote: :On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:55:47PM -0300, Fernando P . Schapachnik wrote: :> I agree. Web based solutions are out of the question, as they don't :> seem to be a very good replacement for a "real" application like :> Outlook. : :Erm, perhaps it's not immediately obvious to me, but... why? : The calandering stuff in Outlook is actually pretty nice. It's a shame there aren't better choices, though. Outlook is horrible MUA, and Excahnge servers are resource pigs. And of course, it's all windows only. : -- dscheidt@tumbolia.com Bipedalism is only a fad. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message