From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 6 13:54:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557E316AF1C for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4299B43D7B for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:53:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k56DrhVa037241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:53:43 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k56DrbmA037240; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:53:37 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:53:37 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Tyrone.VanDerHaar@TelecityRedbus.se Message-ID: <20060606135337.GL98544@cell.sick.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff , Tyrone.VanDerHaar@TelecityRedbus.se, freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: route malfunction wrong info X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:54:04 -0000 On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:13:15PM +0200, Tyrone.VanDerHaar@TelecityRedbus.se wrote: T> Can anyone tell me if this is a bug or not? T> -Vlan137 is up T> -I issue an ifconfig vlan137 down T> -I then issue route get (subnet on the downed interface) and is show it as up Yes, this is known behavior of BSD kernel. I'm not sure whether kernel should rebuild routing table if interface status changes. However, routing daemons should. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE