Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 20:52:51 +0100 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: d008ed9fc471 - main - editors/bless: resurrect^Wreadd previously expired port Message-ID: <lend-n2ek-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <8rje-ns1a-wny@FreeBSD.org> (Jan Beich's message of "Sun, 11 Dec 2022 11:39:13 %2B0100") References: <202212010944.2B19iKex079308@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <8rje-ns1a-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> writes: > >> +++ b/editors/bless/Makefile >> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ >> +PORTNAME= bless >> +PORTVERSION= 0.6.3 >> +DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v >> +CATEGORIES= editors > > What happened to PORTEPOCH added in 1cdc1ee0cb04 ? ports@ list is now > spammed about version going backwards. > >> +MAINTAINER= mono@FreeBSD.org > > Without their approval? A leaf port, not part of upstream Mono project. > mono@ may have maintained it in the past but the team roster and priorities > likely have changed after ~7 years the port was removed. > > Not being a maintainer means you'll miss out on any notifications about > the port like the above PORTEPOCH regression. Apologies. I've compromised my point with loaded wording. Consider it as rant and ignore.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lend-n2ek-wny>