From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 15 05:05:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D445316A4D2 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 05:05:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449F543D53 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 05:05:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D66C512D1; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:05:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:05:05 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Freebsd0101@aol.com Message-ID: <20050115050505.GA84051@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Kris' World X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 05:05:17 -0000 --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 07:16:33PM -0500, Freebsd0101@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 1/14/05 6:47:32 PM Eastern Standard Time,=20 > kris@obsecurity.org writes: > >> I know how linux, windows, openbsd and every other major open > >> source project works, and I know how FreeBSD > >> used to work. I don't know of any other "open source" project > >> that abandons its best version to spend 2 years working on=20 > >> a re-write. > >> > >Me either, including FreeBSD. > ----- > Ah, so if you are in complete and total denial of "reality", how > can you claim that other don't understand it? All > of the above has been proven, so why don't you think it=20 > applies to FreeBSD? Speak. I smirk at your "proven" claims. I point at you and laugh at your strident "proof" that FreeBSD 4.x doesn't support a particular chipset, in the face of reports that it does, in fact, support the chipset (earlier mails that you pretended not to see). Welcome back to my killfile (although I doubt you'll stay there long because of your desperate need to hear your own voice). Kris --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB6KSBWry0BWjoQKURAi/yAJ0Vq9Zv70iqcWmfqYSK4QvRYgsQ4QCg+6pI /0VEKiLmrz7OOIat3huU79A= =d4pr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--