From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 12 03:10:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0C316A41C for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:10:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron.glenn@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18D443D46 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:10:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron.glenn@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s18so462941nze for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:10:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Y0oS3O5AFI370Cl1tJJHs1OOSVXevN334DxnPzfa8+dIGkvZ0RuhNzxnhAW2jXUQNCDkIMATi0zJgnVNL5Wx4Jac2dFJRghoP5inu2JKoKNAikpn/C5iG6BiOtH0wsQ2/XmFBTksil5aVnt8qPh5ydtk2SHQtJ9dMsvIraD03NY= Received: by 10.36.222.77 with SMTP id u77mr1504886nzg; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.66.2 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18f601940507112010726ecd13@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:10:27 -0700 From: Aaron Glenn To: "Giovanni P. Tirloni" In-Reply-To: <1473.201.11.22.205.1121134115.squirrel@webmail.bs2.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1473.201.11.22.205.1121134115.squirrel@webmail.bs2.com.br> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd ataraid situation X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Glenn List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:10:31 -0000 On 7/11/05, Giovanni P. Tirloni wrote: > But I'd like to ask if it'd theoretically be possible to create the RAID= 1 > array (ar0) with only one disk and add the second one later? It'd work > like a broken array for some time. It's just an idea :) What is the advantage of building a faulty array? aaron.glenn