Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 20:07:48 -0400 From: Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SUJ and "mount" reporting Message-ID: <4C02FDD4.4030705@protected-networks.net> In-Reply-To: <htutrv$cu$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1005171616390.1398@desktop> <htutrv$cu$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/10 19:54, Ivan Voras wrote: > Shouldn't SU+J be visible in the output of "mount" somehow? I've just > enabled it on a root file system of a machine and while tunefs and > dumpfs report both soft-updates and SUJ are enabled (after reboot), the > "mount" command only shows "soft-updates". Alternative question: how to > verify is it active on a live file system? tunefs -p <file-system> works even when the file-system is mounted in multi-user mode, e.g. imb@toshi:/home/imb> tunefs -p / tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a) disabled tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N) disabled tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l) disabled tunefs: soft updates: (-n) enabled tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j) enabled tunefs: gjournal: (-J) disabled tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e) 2048 tunefs: average file size: (-f) 16384 tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s) 64 tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m) 8% tunefs: optimization preference: (-o) time tunefs: volume label: (-L) imb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkwC/dQACgkQQv9rrgRC1JKzagCgiviuFD/uTunc5bYQvkjvnT0j p1IAn3OJ8af8W4Jjj34cZVUyX4EMDk32 =cw0I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C02FDD4.4030705>