From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 15 06:30:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A5F37B401; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 06:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366B043FB1; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 06:30:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ilmar@watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3FDVGrD068066; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:31:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ilmar@watson.org) Received: from localhost (ilmar@localhost)h3FDVFKD068042; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:31:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ilmar@watson.org) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: ilmar owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:31:15 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030415092837.G92160@fledge.watson.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: m_pkthdr.label now moved to m_tag X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:30:59 -0000 On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > This change is in the implementation details regarding how internalized > labels are stamped onto m_tag's -- it doesn't make any changes to where > those labels come from. As with before, I think the three most useful > approaches to take are CIPSO, IPsec, and firewall-derived labels, none of > which are implemented in the base system or MAC tree currently. I understood, that this only changes labels' location. My question was - would RIPSO/CIPSO/IPSEC labels implemented and included in the base freebsd system. Are there any plans about that?