Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:04:29 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 218849] Remove rc.conf jail configuration via jail_* variables
Message-ID:  <bug-218849-8-CWwYoqfZ1u@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-218849-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-218849-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218849

--- Comment #14 from rainer@ultra-secure.de ---
I think the PTB (powers that be) ultimately decided that it's not in the
interest of the project to have a tool and (and possibly an API) in base to
create jails a la ezjail.

At least, that's my educated guess.

IIRC, iX-Systems uses (and sponsors) iocage (previously "warden").
Doubtlessly, other vendors/integrator have their own tools for managing jai=
ls -
some may be in-house.
Maybe there was a tendency not to create too much overlapping functionality=
 in
the base-system.

It would be interesting to know if any of these vendors would be affected.

As such, maybe somebody can bring this up at the next dev/vendor-summit (wh=
ich
I assume to be at BSDCAN).

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-218849-8-CWwYoqfZ1u>