From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 5 15:42:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF1C5ED for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94C8015B3 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14856 invoked by uid 89); 5 Dec 2013 15:36:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bsd64.grem.de) (mg@grem.de@194.97.158.66) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 5 Dec 2013 15:36:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:36:00 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin To: Yasuhiro KIMURA Subject: Re: Output change of 'pkg info' after 1.2. Message-ID: <20131205163600.0d9f3f6f@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20131206.001338.320545926.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20131206.001338.320545926.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.18; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:42:45 -0000 On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:13:38 +0900 (JST) Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > I noticed that output of 'pkg info' changed after version 1.2. > > If I remember correctly, 1.1.x behaved as following: > > - 'pkg info -q pkg-name' outputs package name with version. > - 'pkg info pkg-name' outputs package name with version, and comment. > - 'pkg info -f pkg-name' outputs full information. > > But 1.2.1 works as following: > > - 'pkg info -q pkg-name' outputs nothing. > - Both 'pkg info pkg-name' and 'pkg info -f pkg-name' outputs full > information. Just tested, pkg 1.1.4 vs. 1.2.1 pkg info -q pkg-name is identical on both, but "-f" vs no parameter definitely changed and this seems like a bug to me. > > Is this change intended one? > > --- > Yasuhiro KIMURA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Michael Gmelin