From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 13 21:10:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3427816A423 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757D743D7E for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:10:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2DLAJ1b001471 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:10:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2DLAJuv001467; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:10:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:10:19 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200603132110.k2DLAJuv001467@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Vivek Khera Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D5316A424 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@lorax.kcilink.com) Received: from lorax.kcilink.com (lorax.kciLink.com [206.112.95.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA23343D62 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@lorax.kcilink.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorax.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE42115CB for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:10:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from lorax.kcilink.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lorax.kcilink.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 47696-03-2 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:10:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by lorax.kcilink.com (Postfix, from userid 120) id 389EE115C3; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:10:06 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20060313211006.389EE115C3@lorax.kcilink.com> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:10:06 -0500 (EST) From: Vivek Khera To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Cc: Subject: kern/94424: BGE5721 or BGE5750? X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vivek Khera List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:10:33 -0000 >Number: 94424 >Category: kern >Synopsis: BGE5721 or BGE5750? >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Mar 13 21:10:18 GMT 2006 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Vivek Khera >Release: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p4 i386 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD lorax.kcilink.com 6.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Thu Jan 26 17:37:40 EST 2006 vivek@lorax.kcilink.com:/u/lorax1/usr6/obj.i386/n/lorax1/usr6/src/sys/LORAX i386 >Description: I'm trying to make a BGE5714 chip found in the IBM e326m server recognized by the bge driver. To do so I was comparing the vendor ID and device ID numbers from other systems I have and noticed that according the boot logs this device: bge0@pci5:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x01851028 chip=0x165914e4 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 is identified by 6.1-PRE as bge0: mem 0xdfaf0000-0xdfa This is what Dell claims is in this server (Dell PE800). However, according to pciconf -l -v the PCI database claims it is BCM5750A1 NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express So something disagrees with something here. I never really opened up this box to find what chipset was *really* in there, and I send the original PR that got the PE800 ethernet support into FreeBSD 5.4, so it could be Dell's error in their literature. >How-To-Repeat: n/a >Fix: Resolve the inconsistency between if_bgreg.h and if_bge.c and the pciconf database. I have no idea how to figure out which is more accurate. I suspect pciconf is. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: