From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 10:24:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA9116A412 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA5D43D77 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:24:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.146] (helo=anti-virus03-09) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GSA74-0008FB-30; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:24:30 +0100 Received: from [82.41.35.166] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GSA70-0001MI-Kb; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:24:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4518FFD9.70208@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:24:25 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Desmond Coughlan References: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:24:54 -0000 Desmond Coughlan wrote: >Hi, > I hope that I'm not sending this to the wrong list, or that the question hasn't already been answered. > > This is the right list. If you want to know if something similar has been answered before then try searching the archives which you can find from www.freebsd.org or just try google on freebsd plus some relevant keywords. > > I'm trying to install 6.1-RELEASE onto a Pentium-3. > > I had a lot of trouble creating the diskettes, but after changing the floppy drive, no problem. Now, when I do the install, I have two hard drives, and configure them as follows... > > disk0 > 150M / > 512M /etc > 512M /etc > > 1024M /bin > /etc and /bin cannot be separate filesystems. What made you think this was sensible? I barely use 150Mb for / + /etc +/bin and only because I seem to have kept about 6 different kernels :-) So using 512Mb for / including /etc would be fine and leave lots of space. Even 128Mb would do given the apparent smallness of your disks. Honestly, your whole partitioning scheme looks odd to me. > 4096M /forums > 4096M /mail > 4096M /sql > With small disks why split the space up like this at all? Dump everything into one extra partition e.g. /home and make directories for mail sql and forums under that. Then it doesn't matter which of these ends up growing the largest - they all have the benefit of having as much expansion space as possible and space doesn't get wasted when one of your partitions sits at 5% full while the others grow to 90% full, for example. --Alex