From owner-freebsd-doc Sun May 16 9:48:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from smtp13.bellglobal.com (smtp13.bellglobal.com [204.101.251.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C7314BB8 for ; Sun, 16 May 1999 09:48:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vanderh@ecf.toronto.edu) Received: from localhost.nowhere (ppp18393.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.130.73]) by smtp13.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA25419; Sun, 16 May 1999 12:49:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.nowhere (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA43378; Sun, 16 May 1999 12:49:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 12:49:07 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Jesus Rodriguez Cc: Jim Mock , doc@FreeBSD.ORG, Nik Clayton Subject: Re: freebsd.org domain Message-ID: <19990516124906.B43261@mAd> References: <19990516213532.A22023@blues.ghis.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: ; from Jesus Rodriguez on Sun, May 16, 1999 at 05:51:53PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 05:51:53PM +0200, Jesus Rodriguez wrote: > > Well, i prefer freebsd.org too, so seems it wins. "freebsd.org" sucks. Try a quick frequency count from the list archives or through the handbook or something. I say FreeBSD.org or FreeBSD.ORG is much better. -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message