From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 13 10:51:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8692B37B401; Tue, 13 May 2003 10:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287FF43FCB; Tue, 13 May 2003 10:51:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23]) by attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with SMTP id <2003051317515400200qf1fhe>; Tue, 13 May 2003 17:51:55 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:51:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Bruce Evans In-Reply-To: <20030513200107.R1096@gamplex.bde.org> Message-ID: <20030513104950.C3033@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <200305130810.h4D8A5rd086116@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030513200107.R1096@gamplex.bde.org> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sys stat.2 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:51:58 -0000 On Tue, 13 May 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2003, Doug Barton wrote: > > > dougb 2003/05/13 01:10:05 PDT > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > lib/libc/sys stat.2 > > Log: > > * The copy of the stat struct in the man page has rotted, so remove it. > > Those who really need this information can find it in the include file. > > Er, I think standard structs like this are among the few structs that > should be documented in man pages. I don't disagree with you, but since I didn't want to take responsibility for keeping it up to date, I didn't copy it over. Basically, I was responding to a reqeust from re@ to update it related to my update of stat(1). If someone more knowledgeable wants to improve on my work, I will be happy to see it done. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection