From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Dec 12 19:11:16 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA11739
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 12 Dec 1995 19:11:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA11725
          Tue, 12 Dec 1995 19:11:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: Host localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: dk+@ua.net
cc: mitayai@dreaming.org (Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe), jkh@freebsd.org,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: A call for DNS secondaries to server for <dom>.freebsd.org 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Dec 1995 03:00:00 +0200."
             <QQztwe05709.199512130108@relay5.UU.NET> 
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 19:11:12 -0800
Message-ID: <11723.818824272@freefall.freebsd.org>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> in Ukraine (.ua), there isn't org.ua domain at all (not that we haven't
> thought about it - "we" means domain administrators, incl. me as admin-c).
> Alternatively, you can apply for freebsd.com.ua ;-)

I think we've all pretty much decided that we should stick with
subdomains of .org.  Even one important missing freebsd.org.<dom> is
enough to ruin the orthogonality of the scheme and hence defeat the
entire purpose.

> (btw, is FreeBSD Inc. an officially registered legal entity?)

It is indeed.

> should settle with different scheme. XX.ftp.freebsd.org could be good.

I don't think so. :-)

					Jordan