From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 17 07:45:55 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id HAA13121 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 07:45:55 -0800 Received: from hp.com (hp.com [15.255.152.4]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA13115 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 07:45:54 -0800 Received: from hpautow.aus.hp.com by hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.14/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA261655949; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 07:45:49 -0800 Message-Id: <199502171545.AA261655949@hp.com> Received: by hpautow.aus.hp.com (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA23393; Sat, 18 Feb 1995 02:45:37 +1100 From: "M.C Wong" Subject: sendmail with UUCP and DNS again To: freebsd-questions@freefall.cdrom.com (freebsd-questions@freefall.cdrom.com) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 1995 2:45:37 EDT X-Mailer: Elm [revision: 109.14.c] Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Sorry to follow up with my own question asked previously. But is it a correct or reasonable thing to use wilcard MX to deliver mail for remote host via the uucp smart host , ie : *.* IN MX uucp_smart_host since, all the local hosts either have A record or explicit MX record. Thanks. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ M.C Wong Email: mcw@hpato.aus.hp.com Australian Telecom Operation Voice: +61 3 272 8058 Hewlett-Packard Australia Ltd Fax: +61 3 898 9257 31 Joseph St, Blackburn 3130, Australia OS: FreeBSD-1.1.5.1 http://hpautow.aus.hp.com:9999/~mcw/mcw.html (or http://hpautorf/~mcw)