From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 15:20:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FB01065672 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D425B8FC16 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5AFK2Ji097204 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p5AFK2lG097203; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:20:02 GMT Message-Id: <201106101520.p5AFK2lG097203@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org From: Eir Nym Cc: Subject: Re: kern/157723: [geom] GEOM should not process 'c' (raw) partitions for BSD scheme X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eir Nym List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:20:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/157723; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eir Nym To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, eirnym@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/157723: [geom] GEOM should not process 'c' (raw) partitions for BSD scheme Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:47:42 +0400 In discussion in FreeBSD-Current mail list, Andrey V. Elsukov said following information. > You have mixed old partitioning classes with GEOM_PART. > You should remove from the kernel at least: > options =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 GEOM_BSD > options =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 GEOM_MBR > options =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 GEOM_PC98 > options =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 GEOM_VOL And after this duplicates had gone. Please, make these and GEOM_PART_* options incompatible altogether and document them to have no these strange behavior.