From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 6 19:12:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FC716A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 19:12:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kam.pl (bsd.kam.pl [195.205.77.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6742B43D1F for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 19:12:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyzmen@kam.pl) Received: (qmail 42868 invoked by uid 1008); 6 Sep 2004 19:12:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Sep 2004 19:12:39 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 21:12:39 +0200 (CEST) From: "Krzysztof Kowalewski, Jr." To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <200409061836.i86IaMH5063192@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20040906205022.Y42184@bsd.kam.pl> References: <200409061836.i86IaMH5063192@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/71403: new port: polish/sms2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 19:12:45 -0000 On 06/09/2004 at 18:36, Mark Linimon wrote: > Synopsis: new port: polish/sms2 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: linimon > State-Changed-When: Mon Sep 6 18:35:53 GMT 2004 > State-Changed-Why: > Does this need a repocopy from polish/sms? And shouldn't the portname > be changed to sms2? I am not really sure what does repocopy mean, but I think that not, polish/sms should be left as different port, apart from polish/sms2, altho it is 'the same' program. -- Best regards, Krzysztof Kowalewski.