From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 01:08:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942901065675; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:08:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686438FC15; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99568170F9; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:09:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received; s=aegis; t= 1311642555; bh=9DEXDfA7f/BMtOcPGIyoJsXsxt2z9Gt9Xi+nvRJhnDw=; b=h 9v5khRsZ9+XXGUrTVI0bRqa/9GItin2+jI8bxWx9yWxgzHSG+OCA2RMp1Ia2xryp g96YxUccrDip1ged94qULGRY0uE7gBynzl70mRnhqVSnjkY3t+RFYi66U+ZJhHtV gW48jtYb7qjAYte7qdPk4ExByYCMEuEAcHN/4tR8Yk= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id SIAW7MgePzeV; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:09:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:08:39 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20110726010838.GA936@magic.hamla.org> References: <201107251146.p6PBkSLU027484@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E2DF92D.9020601@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E2DF92D.9020601@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Frederic Culot , Eric , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/rubygem-mail Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sahil Tandon List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:08:47 -0000 On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 16:15:57 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Silently using activesupport if it is installed already is exactly > what you should not do. The change to remove the dependency should be > backed out. >From the upstream changelog: "Remove ActiveSupport from the dependencies, load Active Support if present, or use internals if not" Would it be more appropriate to have an option that pulls in the activesupport depedency if it is desired by the user? -- Sahil Tandon