From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 6 10:50:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705D91065671 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4148FC2E for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (vpn-cl-166-152.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.166.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10C1405BCE; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:50:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47CFCC86.90208@bsdforen.de> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:50:46 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080303) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <47CBC3C5.9050007@bsdforen.de> <20080303155354.2043d131@gumby.homeunix.com.> <47CC49B8.6080501@bsdforen.de> <20080303213454.53f29198@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080303213454.53f29198@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interactive ports - the plague X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:50:49 -0000 RW wrote: > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:55:52 +0100 > Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >> RW wrote: >>> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100 >>> Dominic Fandrey wrote: >>> > >>>> I cannot find any policy on interactive ports in the Porters' >>>> Handbook. Maybe there aught to be one. >>> Setting BATCH is supposed to prevent genuinely interactive ports >>> from building (that's actually the original purpose of BATCH). >> But this will also keep the config screens away from me, which can be >> handled before all builds quite comfortably. > > Not if you do the config screens before setting BATCH. Thanks for the suggestion. The lines: .if !make(config*) BATCH= yes .endif in my make.conf works well with portmaster. The config screens appear but ghostscript remains silent.