From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Apr 22 18:10:53 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA27202
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 18:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA27159;
          Thu, 23 Apr 1998 01:10:22 GMT
          (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA07669;
	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:10:06 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from toor)
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199804230110.UAA07669@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: Static vs. dynamic linking (was Re: Using MD5 insted of DES ...)
In-Reply-To: <199804230048.RAA15843@implode.root.com> from David Greenman at "Apr 22, 98 05:48:35 pm"
To: dg@root.com
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:10:06 -0500 (EST)
Cc: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, benedict@echonyc.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> >Programs where it is likely slightly advantageous to link shared:
> >	cc1, cc1plus
> 
>    We found that compile times increased 10% when cc1 was compiled shared, so
> that would not be a good candidate.
> 
I meant with shared libs.  Correction to my statements: when I said "linked
shared", I meant "linked with shared libs".  Linking CC1 and CC1PLUS "shared"
would be terrible.

John

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message