From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 04:20:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA9C37B405 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 04:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-97.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE89B43F75 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 04:20:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA0B66D74; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 04:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A47C4649; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 04:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 04:20:02 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Hye-Shik Chang Message-ID: <20030807112002.GA74654@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030807100256.GG73360@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030807103105.GA71291@mithrandr.moria.org> <20030807104629.GA74437@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030807105623.GA71761@mithrandr.moria.org> <20030807110312.GA46273@i18n.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030807110312.GA46273@i18n.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Neil Blakey-Milner cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [kris@FreeBSD.org: cvs commit: ports/www/zope Makefile] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 11:20:15 -0000 --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:03:12PM +0900, Hye-Shik Chang wrote: > > I'm pretty sure the zope port used to build in the bento environment, > > though. Yeah, it did at one point. I suspect it might have something to do with the ldconfig cache not being populated in the build chroots (I'll look into it), but fixing the nasty != invocation is a good thing anyway. > Please review this patch. Looks good! A PORTREVISION bump is probably also needed since we expect it to fix the thread support in the packages. Kris --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/MjXiWry0BWjoQKURAs9mAJ9cKxRQe3HrrUgE8JoA8QiAwI0goQCgiQyQ UNPT09Seb6iNA0nexMKCnpk= =oTLx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--