From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sun Oct 29 07:05:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03FEE5BA8D; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 07:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B106E993; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 07:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F819273A4; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 07:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v9T75QhH028040; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 07:05:26 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Eric McCorkle cc: Benjamin Kaduk , Ben Laurie , "freebsd-security@freebsd.org security" , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Crypto overhaul In-reply-to: From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <13959.1509132270@critter.freebsd.dk> <20171028022557.GE96685@kduck.kaduk.org> <23376.1509177812@critter.freebsd.dk> <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org> <24228.1509196559@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <28038.1509260726.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 07:05:26 +0000 Message-ID: <28039.1509260726@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 10:58:12 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 07:05:36 -0000 -------- In message , Eric Mc= Corkl e writes: >On 10/28/2017 09:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> -------- >> In message <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk wri= tes: >> = >>> I would say that the 1.1.x series is less bad, especially on the last = count, >>> but don't know how much you've looked at the differences in the new br= anch. >> = >> While "less bad" is certainly a laudable goal for OpenSSL, I hope >> FreeBSD has higher ambitions. >> = > >I'm curious about your thoughts on LibreSSL as a possible option. It retains the horrible APIs, so the potential improvement is finite. -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .