From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 18:54:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F3B1065673; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (unknown [IPv6:2a01:170:102f::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AC88FC13; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m8HIsarW000123; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:54:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m8HIsanu000121; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:54:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) From: Oliver Fromme Message-Id: <200809171854.m8HIsanu000121@lurza.secnetix.de> To: jhb@freebsd.org (John Baldwin) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:54:36 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <200809171144.48424.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:54:37 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI "blacklist" question X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:54:39 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > [...] > > Now i'm wondering: Has the ACPI blacklist been removed > > intentionally, or is this a regression? Certainly I did > > not find any mentioning of it in UPDATING or anywhere > > else. > > This is a regression. Try this fix: > > Index: acpi_quirk.c > =================================================================== > --- acpi_quirk.c (revision 183112) > +++ acpi_quirk.c (working copy) > @@ -149,9 +149,9 @@ > if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetTableHeader(ACPI_SIG_FADT, 0, &fadt))) > bzero(&fadt, sizeof(fadt)); > if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetTableHeader(ACPI_SIG_DSDT, 0, &dsdt))) > - bzero(&fadt, sizeof(dsdt)); > + bzero(&dsdt, sizeof(dsdt)); > if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetTableHeader(ACPI_SIG_XSDT, 0, &xsdt))) > - bzero(&fadt, sizeof(xsdt)); > + bzero(&xsdt, sizeof(xsdt)); > > /* Then, override the quirks with any matched from table signatures. */ > for (entry = acpi_quirks_table; entry->match; entry++) { > Thanks for the quick reply. I will try this on Friday when I'm near the console. I'm a little reluctant to try it remotely. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "The ITU has offered the IETF formal alignment with its corresponding technology, Penguins, but that won't fly." -- RFC 2549