From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 15:40:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DA61065694 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sathler90@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6F98FC1F for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so2243365fxm.13 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:40:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m0V07Z6czU0HvW9bTXZkCjxKsh0T4KG9CbKT/cBigyM=; b=c5IggM6zJF5MCw6EHeKbfg+9+IZdGsqpk+tjUegOAN7O2EDDs14HMUqk/7RK8RwLDw 1cMeWTzxdUxg8RvmU8BX/LLSY80Pi6l3tUpkZXQ3NvDUeDrssvtRWZzXAqjWnJkd/OIe GbXHXf/mFHzypn4Cz2ugt8P+01CHR+kgaS0PE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=NS1dv/EGixndHoTnxdKY6CyoLotIxoPj/pOPgGNJegJcr0bqRbanorlWVhTPwc8zim WUcR0cCA8hngHflBxiiSDx3N28di7qWwB74GcTbwMvF44GLNX4Lh4ZswIkrA+NO5vyCD vhxbXp+pDDBEKjAJS3VN4KkEUw7CxPiiPdWHw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.82.91 with SMTP id a27mr933231bkl.3.1281712479817; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.163.84 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:14:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:14:39 -0300 Message-ID: From: Eduardo To: Sandra Kachelmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:40:48 -0000 Just curious, is it really true that portupgrade is "abandonware" ? I think I have seen some updates to it on the ports tree in the last six months ... thanks, -Ed. On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > I've been using ports-mgmt/portupgrade pretty much ever since it > started to exist. Unfortunately portupgrade seems to be pretty much > "abandonware" so I've been told to move on to portmaster. Despite the > very long manpage I can't seem to be able to achieve the following > thing with portmaster: > > $ portupgrade --batch -a > > If I issue this command I know exactly that I can go out, have a > drink, cook some dinner and unlock my workstation the next day and > find that everything completed unless a port failed to build. With > portmaster I get asked a s*t load of interactive questions, whether I > want to delete some package, whether it's really okay to pull in all > the dependencies and so on. > > Can someone spoonfeed me the command I need to issue with portmaster > in order to achieve the same thing as with > > $ portupgrade --batch -a > > Is that even possible? > > $ portupgrade --batch -a > > Thanks in advance! > > Sandra > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >