From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 20 05:52:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA13619 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 05:52:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bbs.mpcs.com (bbs.mpcs.com [204.215.226.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA13604 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 12:51:56 GMT (envelope-from hgoldste@bbs.mpcs.com) Received: (from hgoldste@localhost) by bbs.mpcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/MPCS spamzap) id IAA10156; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 08:51:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 08:51:54 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein Message-Id: <199804201251.IAA10156@bbs.mpcs.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: 2.2.6R (and alias)...suitability for production sys? Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Has there been a resolution of the vanishing interface alias thing mentioned here a week or so ago on 2.2.6R? ERRATA.TXT is silent on it. Trying to get a grip on it before we commit to going either with security-patched 2.2.5Rs or going all the way with 6R. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message