From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 12:29:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191421065670 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from annulen@yandex.ru) Received: from forward10.mail.yandex.net (forward10.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EBB8FC1A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web80.yandex.ru (web80.yandex.ru [77.88.60.147]) by forward10.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id E949220D8163; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:29:48 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1296649788; bh=qzQZhr9fT/yzNDgHDjPeTpHCynooImwMcgcFZMkMRhY=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=j7nGy4jhER9u1n8bqUUnb4/zdwhwvtPgmz7kQTQgjIdhmNH4BMUrXZct5vYPXxCr3 bvBMQmGG9fm8oCvfauSCPNWso/P0Ib2Xz0EMRFR0LZkfboy4rpuAlAh+nNyroRiYXB y76UPVhyu4jVIoid/GFATMA1dnX8ANc52C7VPhO0= Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web80.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id D1A80FC003B; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:29:48 +0300 (MSK) Received: from [195.34.30.225] ([195.34.30.225]) by mail.yandex.ru with HTTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:29:48 +0300 From: Konstantin Tokarev To: Anton Shterenlikht In-Reply-To: <20110202111857.GA58885@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20110202102816.GA58343@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <335051296642710@web20.yandex.ru> <20110202111857.GA58885@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <6851296649788@web80.yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:29:48 +0300 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: policy on having the same routines in different library archives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:29:51 -0000 > I realise that fortran numerical libraries will > not interest many, so perhaps this is irrelevant anyway.. > I guess ones who are interested will prefer to have a choice of BLAS implementation depending on target hardware, parallelization scales, peculiarities of problem, personal preference, etc., etc. -- Regards, Konstantin