From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:29:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0671065678 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@SpringDaemons.com) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9C98FC18 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@SpringDaemons.com) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E0C5A8FC4F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:29:35 +0300 (MSK) Received: from sputnik.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [83.166.229.34]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2509B8FC18; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:29:34 +0300 (MSK) Received: by sputnik.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix, from userid 1024) id 30E3BB86F; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:41:42 +0300 (MSK) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:41:41 +0300 From: Stanislav Sedov To: d@delphij.net Message-Id: <20090113134141.a87a8ecf.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <496C47CD.7030701@delphij.net> References: <20090112200128.GA85280@freebsd.org> <20090113100623.493b3b43.stas@FreeBSD.org> <496C47CD.7030701@delphij.net> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprin: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Tue Jan 13 13:29:35 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 496c6d0f967001753717818 Cc: Roman Divacky , Xin LI , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC]: flex/lex update X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:29:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:37 -0800 Xin LI mentioned: > > My $0.02 personal opinion: if we (say, nobody among -committers@ or > someone who is actively answering PRs if any) do not intend to maintain > it ourselves, then it would be probably a good idea to make it > up-to-date with the vendor version, or rename it to something like > 'bsdlex' and teach the build infrastructure about it. Build tools > should work out-of-the-box and act similar, or at least, not very far > from other POSIX operating systems IMHO =-) > I agree, but it should be deeply analyzed what we'll receive with an updated version, and what loose. If there were local patches, they should be analyzed an reimplemented for the new version as well. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklsb+UACgkQK/VZk+smlYFQQQCfZBbsodlfXXY0IomC8MBnbDQy b5cAn1/15JmI14tQVtHKGlf/R4GBpNl5 =Yj9C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:496c6d0f967001753717818!