Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 17:38:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 262008] editors/libreoffice failed to build Message-ID: <bug-262008-25061-ZZBeyONx87@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-262008-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-262008-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D262008 --- Comment #57 from Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #53) Upstream doesn't have the libc++abi workaround parts for powerpc and powerp= c64, so maybe it was never necessary there? Or maybe nobody ever ran into the is= sue on these architectures. The question is whether the addition of __attribute__((aligned)) to struct _Unwind_Exception makes any difference in the size of __cxa_exception on the platform. On x86_64, the maximum alignment is 16 bytes, so the addition of= the attribute makes the total struct grow from 120 to 128 bytes. Depending on how powerpc and powerpc64 struct layouts end up, adding the attribute may or may not make a difference. If it does, then we should prob= ably add a similar piece of workaround code as was done for x86_64. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-262008-25061-ZZBeyONx87>