Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:22:37 +0900 From: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch Message-ID: <SI2PR01MB5036E7AF6CF0ED884D1EA55BFAD5A@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> In-Reply-To: <SI2PR01MB50368721C37B204763774016FAD5A@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> References: <92667a5ea6afeab7ce9c55528af34f49@freebsd.org> <48b835a442707d7b8db4f4b270c12897@freebsd.org> <9e2b9b33-0ef5-49d6-8580-fd01518044cf@groumpf.org> <SI2PR01MB50368721C37B204763774016FAD5A@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2023/10/18 09:06:
> pkg set -n openssl:openssl111
> pkg set -o security/openssl:security/openssl111
> Will these changes also update the local.sqlite deps table? :)
I have run it in my environment. in use :)
>From the results of `pkg shell .dump | grep openssl`, it seems that the rewrite was done as I thought.
A few lines of examples are quoted below.
INSERT INTO packages VALUES(27078,'security/openssl111','openssl111','1.1.1w,1','TLSv1.3 capable SSL and crypto library',replace('T ...(omitted)
INSERT INTO deps VALUES('security/openssl111','openssl111','1.1.1w,1',22497);
INSERT INTO deps VALUES('security/openssl111','openssl111','1.1.1w,1',22958);
This changed the pkg version results as follows.
> pkg version -v -e openssl111
openssl111-1.1.1w,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.1.1w)
Since PORTEPOCH is different, it seems that it needs to be rebuilt and reinstalled after all :)
By the way, security/openssl111 of origin has been disused once, around 2020-01-01.
And if it is used again, how will PORTEPOCH be treated?
Regards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SI2PR01MB5036E7AF6CF0ED884D1EA55BFAD5A>