Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 10:32:06 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Syscall number. Message-ID: <3E04B3A6.A820638A@mindspring.com> References: <20021220184337.GD11475@garage.freebsd.pl> <20021221032233.GG11475@garage.freebsd.pl> <3E04A8D2.C6CDBF6A@mindspring.com> <20021221175226.GP11475@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 09:45:54AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > +> This is actually a bad way to do things. > +> > +> There is a system call loadable module type, and you should > +> use that instead of directly accessing the system call entry > +> table and stomping on values without asserting appropriate > +> locks. > > But I want to operate on existing syscalls. Then specify a system call number instead of allowing the system to pick an unassigned system call for you. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E04B3A6.A820638A>