From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Jan 31 17:00:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA00606
          for security-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 17:00:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA00592
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 17:00:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <15742(13)>; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:59:48 PST
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177479>; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:59:39 -0800
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95
To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
cc: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>, security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [cisco.external.bugtraq] Re: BoS: bind() Security Problems 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:30:09 PST."
             <9601311930.AA00772@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:59:29 PST
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <96Jan31.165939pst.177479@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <9601311930.AA00772@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Garrett write:
>It should be possible to require that SO_REUSEPORT be specified on
>both the original and the duplicate sockets.

In fact, Stevens says that those are already the semantics for SO_REUSEPORT.

  Bill